How does AGPL differ from GPL?

The difference between the AGPL and traditional GPL is simple: The AGPL seeks to close a “loophole” that allows a company or organization to modify GPL’ed software and use it to provide a service — but without actually distributing changes.

Is GPL and AGPL compatible?

Within the GPL family of licenses, GPL compatibility and AGPL compatibility are identical: Each place that the matrix states GPLv3, the same statement about compatibility is true for AGPLv3 as well. This is likely due to the explicit coordination in the section 13 of the AGPL and GPLv3 itself.

What is wrong with AGPL?

The disadvantages of the AGPL are: Puts some teams off open-source packages as it forces all other code to become GPLed software. Some view it as excessive as any module in any dependent package that uses AGPL makes all other software subject to similar restrictions.

Should I use MIT or GPL?

You are correct that the GPL is more restrictive than the MIT license. You cannot include GPL code in a MIT licensed product. If you distribute a combined work that combines GPL and MIT code (except in some particular situations, e.g. ‘mere aggregation’), that distribution must be compliant with the GPL.

What is the difference between GPL and LGPL licenses?

The main difference between the GPL and the LGPL is that the latter allows the work to be linked with (in the case of a library, “used by”) a non-(L)GPLed program, regardless of whether it is free software or proprietary software.

Is LGPL compatible with GPL?

Note that the LGPL is compatible with the GPL: you can decide to “upgrade” to GPL and incorporate it in a wholly GPL licensed project if you wish. You can’t however go the other way and re-license GPL licensed code as LGPL.

Is GPL compatible with Apache?

Is the Apache License compatible with the GNU GPL? Apache License 2.0 is compatible with GPLv3, so you can freely mix the code that’s released under these two licenses. The resulting software, however, must be released under GPLv3.

What licenses are GPL compatible?

These licenses are compatible with the GNU GPL version 2.

Berkeley Database License (aka the Sleepycat Software Product License)
Boost Software License.
CeCILL version 2.
Clarified Artistic License.
Cryptix General License.
EU DataGrid Software License.
Eiffel Forum License, version 2.
Expat License.

Can I use AGPL?

2 Answers. The AGPL is based on the GPL, not the LGPL. It does not contain any linking exceptions, and any work using AGPL code (linked or otherwise, modified or not) must also be AGPL licensed and distributed. Using separate processes can circumvent the (A)GPL, but this is murky ground.

What is weak copyleft?

Strong and weak copyleft Thus, the term “weak copyleft” refers to licenses where not all derived works inherit the copyleft license; whether a derived work inherits or not often depends on how it was derived. “Weak copyleft” licenses are often used to create software libraries.

Should I use MIT or Apache license?

What is the difference between Apache License 2.0 and MIT? MIT is one of the most permissive free software licenses. The MIT license doesn’t impose any such terms. The MIT license is also gaining popularity with developers due to its short and clear license agreement, in contrast to the Apache license agreement.

What GPL license means?

General Public License
GPL is the acronym for GNU’s General Public License, and it’s one of the most popular open source licenses. Richard Stallman created the GPL to protect the GNU software from being made proprietary. It is a specific implementation of his “copyleft” concept.

What’s the difference between the GPL and the AGPL?

Not so with the AGPL. This hole in the GPL is often called “Application Service Provider” hole. Search for “Why AGPL” or “AGPL vs. GPL” or just read this for some real projects who have problems with GPL. The MongoDB tries another interesing thing.

Where does the lifeline gpl-31t battery come from?

The Lifeline GPL-31T is specifically designed for deep-cycle applications. All Lifeline deep-cycle batteries are hand-made in the USA. These batteries are Coast Guard approved and have had to pass demanding mil spec requirements as they are onboard numerous US Military vessels.

Which is the most misunderstood GPL or GPL license?

The AGPL, short for the Affero General Public License is one of these licenses, more specifically a strong copyleft license, and is arguably one of the most misunderstood licenses. Why another GPL?

What’s the difference between the GPL and MIT License?

For example the GPL is explicit about the patent grant you’d be giving when you distribute the code (or derivative work), the MIT license does not discuss patents. Moreover, the GPL license impacts ” derivative works “, but the MIT license does not. This has huge implications.

How does AGPL differ from GPL? The difference between the AGPL and traditional GPL is simple: The AGPL seeks to close a “loophole” that allows a company or organization to modify GPL’ed software and use it to provide a service — but without actually distributing changes. Is GPL and AGPL compatible? Within the GPL family…